Poster
session presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological
Association,
Toronto,
August 2003
Running head: TEEN SHYNESS
How Shy Teens Deal with Shyness:
Strategic and Gender Differences
Bernardo J. Carducci
Shyness Research Institute
Indiana University Southeast
Ariel Fuchs
Marilyn G.
Wagner
Suffern High School, New York
Mervil Carmickle
Shyness Research Institute
Indiana University Southeast
Address all correspondence to: Bernardo J. Carducci, Shyness Research Institute, Indiana University Southeast, New Albany, IN 47150 or bcarducc@ius.edu.
How Shy Teens Deal with Shyness: Strategic and Gender
Differences
Research from varying sources over the past 20 years
indicates that approximately 40% of adults and adolescents surveyed currently
consider themselves to be shy (Carducci, 2000a; Carducci & Clark, 1993;
Carducci & Ragains, 2002; Carducci & Zimbardo, 1995; Crozier, 1982;
Zimbardo, 1977). In addition, past research has also consistently demonstrated
that there are certain situations, such as interacting with authority figures
and members of the opposite sex, that are more likely to elicit shyness than
others for both adults and adolescents (Carducci & Clark, 1993; Carducci
& Ragains, 2002; Zimbardo, 1977).
In attempt to cope with their shyness 85% of adults (Carducci &
Clark, 1993) and 72.5% of adolescents (Carducci & Ragains, 2002) surveyed
indicated they were willing to do something about their shyness. While the previous research has investigated
a variety of the self-selected strategies used by adults to deal with their
shyness (Carducci, 2000c; Carducci et al., 1997), such research is lacking in
the study of shyness in adolescents.
Given the developmental significance associated with peer relationships
during adolescents (cf. Atwater, 1996), the study of shyness as a barrier to
such interpersonal relations is of critical importance (Cheek &
Krasnoperova, 1999). In the spirit of
replication research (Rosenthal, 1990), the purpose of the present study is to
examine the self-selected strategies shy adolescents employ to deal with their
shyness.
Method
Participants
Participants
were 162 high school students (75 males and 87 females), ranging in age from 14
to 19 (M = 16.34, selected from a population of 494 students attending a
suburban public high school located in an eastern metropolitan city.
In their respective English
classrooms, all 494 students in grades 9 to 12 were asked to complete the
Social Interaction Survey consisting of 30 fixed-format self-report items, with
19 items examining general demographic, academic, and social information and 11
items examining various aspects of shyness, such as the shyness-provoking
situations, self-perceived causes of shyness, and self-selected strategies for
dealing with shyness.
Results
Since
the research dealt with the reactions of shy individuals, the responses from
only those 162 individuals who responded “yes” to the survey question: Do you
consider yourself to be a shy person?” were included in the present
analysis. Because of the voluminous
nature of the data, only the responses for the self-selected strategies are
presented.
Overall Analysis
The first column of Table 1 summarizes the percentage
of all shy teens who employed various self-selected strategies to deal with
their shyness. As indicated, the most
frequent self-selected strategy was an individualistic response characterized
by the shy teen trying to make conversation with others (69.1%). The second
most-frequent self-selected strategy was a cluster of affiliative responses
characterized by the shy teen joining group activities outside of (45.7%) and
in (44.4%) school. The third
most-frequent self-selected strategy was another individualist response
characterized by the shy teen trying to go to public places to meet people
(38.9%). The forth most-frequent
self-selected strategy was an individualistic response characterized by the shy
teen using alcohol or drugs (21.6%).
The least frequent self-selected strategy was a cluster of responses
characterized by receiving assistance from mental health professionals (4.9%)
or information from self-help books (2.5%).
Analysis of Gender
Differences
The second and third columns of Table 1 summarize the
percentage of shy females and males, respectively, self-selecting the various
strategies to deal with their shyness.
The pattern of results indicates that the males were more likely than
the females to self-select the individualistic-type strategies of trying to
make conversation with others (72.0% vs. 66.7%), tying to go to public places
(44.0% vs. 34.5%), and using alcohol and drugs (24.0% vs. 19.5%) while females
were more likely than males to self-select the affiliative responses
characterized by joining group activities both in (50.6% vs. 37.3%) and outside
(51.7% vs. 38.7%) of school. Although
the percentage of both groups was rather low, the males were more likely than
the females to receive assistance from mental health processionals (8.0% vs.
2.3%) or information from self-help books (4.0% vs. 1.1%).
Discussion
The present study replicates and extends the findings
of previous research investigating the self-selected strategies of shy individuals
to deal with their shyness. More
specifically, consistent with previous results investigating the self-selected
strategies of shy adults to deal with their shyness (cf. Carducci, 2000c), the
most-frequently utilized self-selected strategies by shy adolescents were
characterized by “forced extraversion” (i.e., trying to make social contact
with others through individualistic or affiliative responses). A rather troubling finding among the present
results was the tendency for shy teens to utilize alcohol and drugs (21.6%) to
a greater degree than previously identified with shy adults (12.7%) as a
self-selected strategy (Carducci, 2000c).
Finally, in contrast to previous research (Carducci, 2000c), shy teens
were less likely than shy adults to seek assistance from mental health
professionals (4.9% vs. 14.6%) and self-help books (2.5% vs. 15.2%).
The
results of the present study extend previous research by examining gender
differences in the self-selected strategies used by shy individuals to deal
with their shyness. The pattern of
results indicates that shy females are more likely than shy males to deal with
their shyness by selecting strategies that involve turning to others while shy
males are more likely than shy females to select strategies that involve taking
actions by themselves. Such a pattern
of results is consistent with the more general “tend-and-befriend” response to
stress in females characterized by seeking and providing social support (Taylor
et al., 2000). Because social norms
favor males as the initiator of social contact, shy males may be more inclined
to select strategies that are more proactive, public, and done without social
support. Such strategies are also more
likely to carry a greater risk of rejection and public embarrassment for shy
males should their individualistic efforts to initiate social contact
fail.
The results of the present study have a number of
treatment implications for parents, teachers, and mental health professionals
to help shy teens deal with their shyness.
In support of the benefits of the “tend-and-befriend” response, parents
and teachers should encourage shy teens, especially shy males, to become more
involved in social clubs and activities as a means of establishing a social
support network. For example, service
learning programs through the school and other community volunteer activities
have been proposed as offering shy individuals non-threatening opportunities
for practicing and developing their social skills in a semi-structured social
environment while minimizing feelings of social anxiety and self-consciousness
(Carducci, 2000b). In addition, to help
shy teens in their efforts to make conversation with others, teachers should
consider including in the general curriculum information on such topics as the
basic elements and protocol for approaching and engaging others in social
conversation (cf. Carducci, 1999).
Finally, because some shy teens, especially shy males (cf. Page, 1990),
use alcohol and drugs to deal with their shyness, parents, teachers, and mental
health professionals should also be sensitive to the possibility of substance
abuse issues.
Finally, the study of adolescent shyness
has implications for understanding some of the more extreme examples of
adolescent violence as exhibited by recent high school shootings perpetrated by
shy, socially isolated, angry adolescents labeled as “cynically shy” (Carducci,
2000b) and the development of strategies for reducing the social isolation
experienced by such socially disenfranchised adolescents (cf. Aronson, 2001).
References
Aronson,
E. (2001). Nobody left to hate:
Teaching compassion after Columbine.
New York: W. H. Freeman.
Atwater,
E. (1996). Adolescence (4th
ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Carducci,
B. J. (1999). The pocket guide to
making successful small talk: How to talk to anyone anytime anywhere about
anything. New Albany, IN: Pocket
Guide Publishing.
Carducci,
B. J. (2000a). Shyness: A bold new
approach. New York:
HarperPerennial.
Carducci,
B. J. (2000b). Shyness: The new
solution. Psychology Today, 33,
38-40, 42-45, & 78.
Carducci, B. J. (2000c). What shy individuals do to cope with their
shyness: A content analysis. In W. R.
Crozier (Ed.), Shyness: Development, consolidation, change (pp. 171-185). New York: Routledge.
Carducci, B. J., & Clark, D. L. (1993,
August). Behavioral, cognitive, and
affective tendencies of chronically and transitionally shy individuals. Poster presentation at the meeting of the
American Psychological Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Carducci, B. J., Marion, C.
R., Lynch, D., Dosch, M. M., & Boley, A. L. (1997, August). Top-ten self-selected strategies to
overcome shyness: A content analysis.
Poster presentation at the meeting of the American Psychological
Association, Chicago.
Carducci, B. J., & Ragains,
K. (2002, August). The personal and
situational pervasive of shyness in adolescents. Poster
presentation at the meeting of the American Psychological Association,
Chicago.
Carducci,
B. J. & Zimbardo, P. G., (1995 November/December). Are you shy? Psychology Today, 34-41.
64, 68, 70, 78, 82.
Crozier,
W. R. (1982). Explanations of social shyness. Current Psychological Reviews,
2, 47-60.
Cheek,
J. M., & Krasnoperova, E. N. (1999).
Varieties of shyness in adolescence and adulthood. In L. A. Schmidt & J. Schulkin (Eds.), Extreme
fear, shyness, and social phobia: Origins, biological mechanisms, and clinical
outcomes (pp. 224-250). New York:
Oxford University Press.
Page, R. M. (1990). Shyness and sociability: A dangerous
combination for illicit substances use in adolescent males? Adolescence, 25, 803-806.
Rosenthal,
R. (1990). Replication in behavioral research. Journal of Social Behavior
and Personality, 5, 1-30.
Taylor,
S. E., Klein, L. C., Lewis, B. P., Gruenewald, T. L., Gurung, R. A. R. &
Updegraff, J. A. (2000). Biobehavioral
responses to stress in females: Tend-and befriend, not fight-or-flight. Psychological Review, 107,
411-429.
Zimbardo,
P. G. (1977). Shyness: What is it, what to do about it. Reading, MA:
Addison-Wesley.
Percentage of Self-Selected Strategies used by Shy Teens to Overcome Shyness*
____________________________________________________________________________
All Shy Teens Shy Females Shy Males
Self-Selected Strategies n
= 162 n = 87 n = 75
_________________________________ ________________________________________
Tried going to public places
(e.g., mall, dances, park) to meet people 38.9 (63) 34.5
(30) 44.0 (33)
Tried making conversation with people
I would like to know 69.1 (112) 66.7 (58) 72.0
(54)
Read Self-Help Books 2.5 (4) 1.1
(1) 4.0 (3)
Used Alcohol or Drugs 21.6 (35) 19.5 (17) 24.0 (18)
Had individual therapy/counseling
4.9 (8) 2.3 (2) 8.0 (6)
Joined clubs or extracurricular
activities in school 44.4 (72) 50.6 (44) 37.3 (28)
Joined activities outside school 45.7 (74) 51.7 (45) 38.7 (29)
____________________________________________________________________________
*Number
of participants selecting each strategy given in parentheses